|
Search -
Finance Home -
Yahoo! -
Help |
|
Quotes & Info
|
| SYX > SEC Filings for SYX > Form 10-K on 18-Mar-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
18-Mar-2009
Annual Report
Overview
Systemax is primarily a direct marketer of brand name and private label products. Our operations are organized in three reportable business segments - Technology Products, Industrial Products and Software Solutions. Our Technology Products segment sells computers, computer supplies and consumer electronics which are marketed in North America, Puerto Rico and Europe. Except for certain PC products that we assemble ourselves and sell under the trademarks Systemax™ and Ultra™, substantially all of our products are manufactured by other companies. We also sell certain computer-related products manufactured for us to our own design under the trademark Systemax™ and Ultra™. Technology products accounted for 92% of our net sales in 2008. Our Industrial Products segment sells a wide array of material handling equipment, storage equipment and consumable industrial items which are marketed in North America. Substantially all of these products are manufactured by other companies. Some products are manufactured for us to our own design and marketed under the trademarks Global™, GlobalIndustrial.com™and Nexel™. Industrial products accounted for 8% of our net sales in 2008. In both of these product groups, we offer our customers a broad selection of products, prompt order fulfillment and extensive customer service. Our Software Solutions segment, which became a reportable segment in 2006, participates in the emerging market for on-demand, web-based business software applications through the marketing of our PCS ProfitCenter Software™application. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15 of this Form 10-K for additional financial information about our business segments as well as information about our geographic operations.
The market for computer products and consumer electronics is subject to intense price competition and is characterized by narrow gross profit margins. The North American industrial products market is highly fragmented and we compete against companies utilizing multiple distribution channels. Distribution of our technology products and industrial products is working capital intensive, requiring us to incur significant costs associated with the warehousing of many products, including the costs of leasing warehouse space, maintaining inventory and inventory management systems, and employing personnel to perform the associated tasks. We supplement our on-hand product availability by maintaining relationships with major distributors and manufacturers, utilizing a combination of stocking and drop-shipment fulfillment.
The primary component of our operating expenses historically has been employee related costs, which includes items such as wages, commissions, bonuses, employee benefits and stock option expenses. We continually assess our operations to ensure that they are efficient, aligned with market conditions and responsive to customer needs.
During the first quarter of 2008 the Company acquired CompUSA's e-commerce business and 16 of its retail leases and related fixtures for direct consideration of approximately $30.6 million. This acquisition accelerated the Company's planned expansion into the retail market place for Technology Products in North America and Puerto Rico.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Certain accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty, and as a result, actual results could differ from those estimates. These judgments are based on historical experience, observation of trends in the industry, information provided by customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. Management believes that full consideration has been given to all relevant circumstances that we may be subject to, and the consolidated financial statements of the Company accurately reflect management's best estimate of the consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Company for the years presented. We identify below a number of policies that entail significant judgments or estimates. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different conditions or assumptions.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize product sales when persuasive evidence of an order arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Generally, these criteria are met at the time of receipt by customers when title and risk of loss both are transferred. Sales are shown net of returns and allowances, rebates and sales incentives. Reserves for estimated returns and allowances are provided when sales are recorded, based on historical experience and current trends.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We record an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect our estimate of the collectibility of our trade accounts receivable. We evaluate the collectibility of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors, including an analysis of the age of customer accounts and our historical experience with accounts receivable write-offs. The analysis also includes the financial condition of a specific customer or industry, and general economic conditions. In circumstances where we are aware of customer charge-backs or a specific customer's inability to meet its financial obligations, a specific reserve for bad debts applicable to amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount management reasonably believes will be collected is recorded. In those situations with ongoing discussions, the amount of bad debt recognized is based on the status of the discussions. While bad debt allowances have been within expectations and the provisions established, there can be no guarantee that we will continue to experience the same allowance rate we have in the past.
Inventories. We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined on the first-in, first-out method except in Europe and retail locations where an average cost is used. Excess and obsolete or unmarketable merchandise are written down based on historical experience, assumptions about future product demand and market conditions. If market conditions are less favorable than projected or if technological developments result in accelerated obsolescence, additional write-downs may be required. While obsolescence and resultant markdowns have been within expectations, there can be no guarantee that we will continue to experience the same level of markdowns we have in the past.
Goodwill and, Intangible Assets - We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 ("FAS 142"), "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," in our valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets. FAS 142 requires that goodwill be reviewed at least annually for potential impairment. The amount of an impairment loss would be recognized as the excess of the asset's carrying value over its fair value.
Long-lived Assets. Management exercises judgment in evaluating our long-lived assets for impairment. We believe we will generate sufficient undiscounted cash flow to more than recover the investments made in property, plant and equipment. Our estimates of future cash flows involve assumptions concerning future operating performance and economic conditions. While we believe that our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect our evaluations.
Accruals. Management exercises judgment in estimating various period end liabilities such as costs related to vendor drop shipments, sales returns and allowances, cooperative advertising and customer rebate reserves, and other vendor and employee related costs. While we believe that these estimates are reasonable, any significant deviation of actual costs as compared to these estimates could have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Income Taxes. We are subject to taxation from federal, state and foreign jurisdictions and the determination of our tax provision is complex and requires significant management judgment. Management judgment is also applied in the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowances that might be required in connection with our ability to realize deferred tax assets.
Since we conduct operations in numerous US states and internationally, our effective tax rate has and will continue to depend upon the geographic distribution of our pre-tax income or losses among locations with varying tax rates and rules. As the geographic mix of our pre-tax results among various tax jurisdictions changes, the effective tax rate may vary from period to period. We are also subject to periodic
examination from domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These examinations include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. We have established, and periodically reevaluate, an estimated income tax reserve on our consolidated balance sheet to provide for the possibility of adverse outcomes in income tax proceedings. While management believes that we have identified all reasonably identifiable exposures and that the reserve we have established for identifiable exposures is appropriate under the circumstances, it is possible that additional exposures exist and that exposures may be settled at amounts different than the amounts reserved.
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilitiesfor the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities and for tax loss carry forwards. The realization of net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. Where it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized, we have provided a valuation allowance. If the realization of those deferred tax assets in the future is considered more likely than not, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase net income in the period such determination is made. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, an adjustment to the valuation allowance may be required, which could materially affect our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Restructuring charges. We have taken restructuring actions in the past and could in the future commence further restructuring activities which result in recognition of restructuring charges if events make it necessary. These actions require management to make judgments and utilize significant estimates regarding the nature, timing and amounts of costs associated with the activity. When we incur a liability related to a restructuring action, we estimate and record all appropriate expenses, including expenses for severance and other employee separation costs, facility consolidation costs (including estimates of sublease income), lease cancellations, asset impairments and any other exit costs. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, the amount of the restructuring charges could be impacted, which could materially affect our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Recently Adopted and Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 157 "Fair Value Measurements". This statement was issued to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and for expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. Effective January 1, 2008 the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, which did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") FAS 157-2, which provides for a one-year deferral of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of FSP 157-2.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3 "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets". FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset. The standard applies prospectively to intangible assets acquired and/or recognized on or after January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of this FSP may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1 "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities". This FSP was issued to clarify that instruments granted in share-based payment transactions can be participating securities prior
to the requisite service having been rendered. The guidance in this FSP applies to the calculation of Earnings Per Share ("EPS") under Statement 128 for share-based payment awards with rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions of this FSP. The Company does not expect the adoption of this FSP to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, "Business Combinations," which replaces FASB Statement 141. SFAS No.141R retains the requirement that the acquisition method of accounting be used for business combinations. The objective of SFAS No. 141R is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness and comparability that reporting entities provide in their financial reports about business combinations and their effects. SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer 1) recognizes and measures identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, 2) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the combination or a gain from a bargain purchase and 3) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008 and will be applied prospectively for all business combinations entered into after the date of adoption. The impact of SFAS No. 141R will depend on the nature and terms of any future business combinations, if any.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Accounting and Reporting of Non-controlling Interest". The objective of SFAS No. 160 is to improve the relevance, comparability and transparency of the financial information that reporting entities provide related to non-controlling interests, sometimes referred to as minority interests. SFAS No. 160 requires, among other things, that non-controlling interests be shown separately in the consolidated entity's equity section of the balance sheet. SFAS No. 160 also establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, for presentation of amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the non-controlling interest, for consistency in accounting for changes in a parent's ownership interest when the parent retains a controlling interest, for the valuation of retained non-controlling equity interests when a subsidiary is deconsolidated and for providing sufficient disclosure that identifies and distinguishes the interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective beginning January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No.160 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Highlights from 2008
The discussion of our results of operations and financial condition that follows will provide information that will assist in understanding our financial statements and information about how certain accounting principles and estimates affect the consolidated financial statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included herein.
† Sales increase of 9% in 2008 over 2007 † CompUSA.com and CompUSA retail contributed $226.3 million in sales † Movements in exchange rates positively impacted European and Canadian sales by approximately $13 million and $5 million, respectively † Revenue growth slowed in the second half of 2008 |
Results of Operations
Key Performance Indicators (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
% %
2008 2007 Change 2007 2006 Change
Net sales by
segment:
Technology
products $ 2,795,441 $ 2,553,716 9.5 % $ 2,553,716 $ 2,148,104 18.9 %
Industrial
products 237,027 225,746 5.0 % 225,746 196,860 14.7 %
Software
solutions 493 413 19.4 % 413 201 105.5 %
Total net sales $ 3,032,961 $ 2,779,875 9.1 % $ 2,779,875 $ 2,345,165 18.5 %
Net sales by
geography:
North America $ 2,092,372 $ 1,847,477 13.3 % $ 1,847,477 $ 1,601,259 15.4 %
Europe 940,589 932,398 .9 % 932,398 743,906 25.3 %
Total net sales $ 3,032,961 $ 2,779,875 9.1 % $ 2,779,875 $ 2,345,165 18.5 %
Gross margin 15.3 % 15.3 % - 15.3 % 14.6 % .7 %
SG&A costs $ 380,778 $ 332,359 14.6 % $ 332,359 $ 282,189 17.8 %
SG&A costs as %
of sales 12.6 % 12.0 % .6 % 12.0 % 12.0 % (.- )%
Operating income $ 83,367 $ 93,942 (11.3 )% $ 93,942 $ 60,730 54.7 %
Operating margin 2.7 % 3.4 % (.7 )% 3.4 % 2.6 % .8 %
Effective income
tax rate 36.9 % 30.5 % 6.4 % 30.5 % 35.2 % (4.7 )%
Net income $ 52,843 $ 69,481 (23.9 )% $ 69,481 $ 45,147 53.9 %
Net margin 1.7 % 2.5 % (.8 )% 2.5 % 1.9 % .6 %
|
NET SALES
Net sales grew 9% to $3 billion driven by growth in both technology and industrial products segments. Excluding the effects of exchange rate changes, sales would have grown 8%. North American technology products sales grew 14% to $1.9 billion. Exchange rate changes did not impact full year sales growth. European technology products sales grew 1% to $940.6 million. Excluding exchange rate benefits, European sales would have been flat.
Sales increased in all three reporting business segments and in both geographies during 2008 over 2007. The Technology Products sales increase was driven by increased internet and retail store sales as the result of the acquisition of the CompUSA ecommerce business and re-opening sixteen retail stores. Sales attributable to CompUSA web and retail were $226.3 million for the year. Excluding CompUSA revenue, total Technology Products revenues increased 0.6% compared to the prior year. In the United States, Technology Products sales excluding CompUSA declined 1.0% for the year. The decline over the year is the result of slower business to business IT and consumer electronics sales as United States economy activity slowed in the second half of 2008. In Europe sales increased .9% compared to a year ago. Movements in foreign exchange rates positively impacted the European sales comparison by approximately $13 million for the year. Excluding exchange rate benefits, European sales would have been flat year over year. Sales in Canada (Other North America) increased by 13.9% compared to the prior year. Excluding exchange rate benefits, sales would have increased 10.9% for the year. The increased sales are primarily the result of the opening of one additional retail store, increased business to business and web sales and generally more stable economic conditions in Canada as compared to other locations. As in the United States, sales slowed in the second half of 2008 in Europe and Canada for both consumer and business to business sales as the result of a slowdown in economic activity.
The growth in Industrial Products sales resulted from the Company increasing its market share through aggressive acquisition of customers via web and catalog, increased web advertising by expanding and refining advertisements for existing product lines and adding new advertising for new product lines via search engines, shipping engines and vertical market sites.
In our Software Solutions segment, revenues continue to be insignificant relative to consolidated revenues. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company reorganized its Software business to reduce its net
loss and negative cash flow. The actions taken resulted in a charge to earnings of approximately $1.7 million. The Company expects to realize savings of approximately $2.6 million annually.
Sales increased in all three reporting business segments and in both geographies during 2007 over 2006. The growth in Technology Products sales was driven primarily by increased internet and retail store sales, private label product sales and expanded product offerings. The growth in Industrial Products sales resulted from the Company increasing its market share through competitive pricing advantages and increased internet sales. The growth in North American sales reflected the above factors in both segments. The growth in European sales was driven by strong business to business gains and by the effect of a weaker US dollar. Exchange rates positively impacted the European sales comparison by approximately $78 million in 2007 as compared to 2006. Excluding the movements in foreign exchange rates, European sales would have increased 12% from the prior year. Sales as measured in local currencies increased in all of the European markets we served in 2007. Sales in our Software segment were not material in 2007 and 2006 due to early stage of operations.
GROSS MARGIN
Consolidated gross margin remained consistent year over year at 15.3%, although in the fourth quarter of 2008 the Company's gross margin declined to 14.4% as the Company lowered certain product prices and offered freight incentives in order to gain market share and respond to competitive pricing pressures. Gross margin is dependent on variables such as product mix, vendor price protection and other sales incentives, competition, pricing strategy, cooperative advertising funds required to be classified as a reduction of cost of sales, freight discounting and other variables, any or all of which may result in fluctuations in gross margin.
Gross margin increased 70 basis points during 2007 over 2006, due primarily to decreased competitive pricing pressures in the Technology Products segment.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased in 2008 over 2007 primarily as a result of the increase in sales volume, added personnel, facility and other operating costs associated with the CompUSA acquisition, as well as increased accounting, auditing, legal and professional expenses and reorganization charges incurred in our Software segment. Significant expense increases include approximately $27.0 million of increased sales and other salaries and related costs related to the increased sales volume; rent and real estate tax increases of $10.6 million; $5.8 million of increased professional and telephone/computer maintenance costs; and $4.3 million of increased credit card fees. CompUSA operations accounted for $23.6 million of these cost increases. Included in 2007 is a gain of approximately $2.4 million from a lawsuit that was settled favorably.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased in 2007 over 2006 primarily as a result of the increase in sales volume as well as increased accounting, auditing, legal and consulting costs related to the Company being subject to Sarbanes Oxley section 404 requirements. Significant expense increases include approximately $26 million of increased internet advertising costs, $8 million of increased sales salaries related to the increased sales volume and an increase in other salaries and related costs of approximately $15 million due to increased staff in areas such as finance, marketing and information technology.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was $.3 million, $1.0 million and $1.7 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006. Interest expense decreased in 2008 and 2007 as a result of decreased short-term borrowings in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The extinguishment of mortgage debt related to our Georgia warehouse sale in the first quarter of 2006 also contributed to the decreased interest expense. Interest and other income, net was $2.0 million, $5.5 million and $9.5 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006. The increase in other income in 2006 mainly resulted from the gain on sale of the Georgia location.
INCOME TAXES
The Company's effective tax rate was 36.9% in 2008 as compared to 30.5% in 2007. The higher tax rate in 2008 is primarily attributed to a higher effective tax rate in the United Kingdom in 2008 as the result of the reversal of the valuation allowance in 2007. The lower effective tax rate in 2007 resulted primarily from the reversal of a valuation allowance of approximately $5.9 million against deferred tax assets in the United Kingdom partially offset by the recording of a valuation allowance of approximately $1.7 million against the deferred tax assets of Germany. The United Kingdom valuation allowance, originally recorded at $10.2 million, had been established in 2005 as the result . . .
|
|