|
Search -
Finance Home -
Yahoo! -
Help |
|
Quotes & Info
|
| PSS > SEC Filings for PSS > Form 8-K on 14-May-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
14-May-2009
Other Events
2) These executives agreed to cancel their PSUs for no monetary compensation. By agreeing to cancellation of the PSUs, the executives eliminated that cost to stockholders for 2009.
3) Matt Rubel, in consideration of the grant of PSUs, agreed to give up his Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "SERP"). Mr. Rubel had the largest award of PSUs and did not get a retention grant award, reinstatement of his SERP or any other monetary consideration for canceling his PSU grant.
4) There was no link between canceling the PSUs and the grant of Stock Settled Stock Appreciation Rights ("SSARs") for retention purposes. Only three of the 13 executives who agreed to cancel their PSUs received retention grants for specific achievements.
5) The accounting value for the retention grant of SSARs was lower than the accounting expense for the PSUs and the potential possible value of the PSUs.
6) The retention grants are different from annual grants in that they have a three year cliff vest. In other words, the award will not vest until 2012 and the executive will receive not receive any value if they voluntarily leave before 2012.
7) No shares of stock were ever issued to executives as a result of the grant of PSUs. Shares that were reserved for the PSUs were returned to the available grant pool just like any other award that is canceled or forfeited by associates where no shares are delivered to associates, as required by our plan that was approved by stockholders.
|
|