|
Search -
Finance Home -
Yahoo! -
Help |
|
Quotes & Info
|
| GBE > SEC Filings for GBE > Form 10-Q on 13-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
13-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
Forward-Looking Statements
This Interim Report contains statements that are not historical facts and
constitute projections, forecasts or forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements
are not guarantees of performance. They involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance
or achievements of the Company (as defined below) in future periods to be
materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or suggested by these statements. You can identify such statements by
the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These
statements use words such as "believe," "expect," "should," "strive," "plan,"
"intend," "estimate" and "anticipate" or similar expressions. When we discuss
strategy or plans, we are making projections, forecasts or forward-looking
statements. Actual results and stockholder's value will be affected by a variety
of risks and factors, including, without limitation, international, national and
local economic conditions and real estate risks and financing risks and acts of
terror or war. Many of the risks and factors that will determine these results
and values are beyond the Company's ability to control or predict. These
statements are necessarily based upon various assumptions involving judgment
with respect to the future. All such forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date of this Report. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or
undertaking to release publicly any updates of revisions to any forward-looking
statements contained herein to reflect any change in the Company's expectations
with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on
which any such statement is based. Factors that could adversely affect the
Company's ability to obtain these results and value include, among other things:
(i) the slowdown in the volume and the decline in the transaction values of
sales and leasing transactions, (ii) the general economic downturn and
recessionary pressures on business in general, (iii) a prolonged and pronounced
recession in real estate markets and values, (iv) the unavailability of credit
to finance real estate transactions in general, and the Company's
tenant-in-common programs in particular, (v) the reduction in borrowing capacity
under the Company's current credit facility, and the additional limitations with
respect thereto, (vi) the continuing ability to make interest and principal
payments with respect to the Company's credit facility, (vii) an increase in
expenses related to new initiatives, investments in people, technology, and
service improvements, (viii) the success of current and new investment programs,
(ix) the success of new initiatives and investments, (x) the inability to attain
expected levels of revenue, performance, brand equity and expense synergies
resulting from the merger of Grubb & Ellis Company and NNN Realty Advisors in
general, and in the current macroeconomic and credit environment in particular,
and (xi) other factors described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed on June 1, 2009.
Overview and Background
The Company reports its revenue by three business segments in accordance with
the provisions of the Segment Reporting Topic of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("Codification").
Transaction Services, which comprises its real estate brokerage operations;
Investment Management, which includes providing acquisition, financing and
disposition services with respect to its investment programs, asset management
services related to its programs, and dealer-manager services by its securities
broker-dealer, which facilitates capital raising transactions for its TIC, REIT
and other investment programs; and Management Services, which includes property
management, corporate facilities management, project management, client
accounting, business services and engineering services for unrelated third
parties and the properties owned by the programs it sponsors. Additional
information on these business segments can be found in Note 12 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Report.
Critical Accounting Policies
A discussion of the Company's critical accounting policies, which include
principles of consolidation, revenue recognition, impairment of goodwill,
deferred taxes, and insurance and claims reserves, can be found in its Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no
material changes to these policies in 2009.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
The Company follows the requirements of the Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Topic
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair
value instruments. In February 2008, the FASB amended the Topic to delay the
effective date of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures for non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (that
is, at least annually). There was no effect on the Company's consolidated
financial statements as a result of the adoption of the Topic as of January 1,
2008 as it relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. For items
within its scope, the amended Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic
deferred the effective date of Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The Company adopted the requirements of the Topic as it relates to
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities in the first quarter of 2009,
which did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued an amendment to the requirements of the
Business Combinations Topic. The amended Topic requires an acquiring entity to
recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at
the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. The Topic changed the
accounting treatment and disclosure for certain specific items in a business
combination. The Topic applies prospectively to business combinations for which
the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted the
requirements of the Topic on a prospective basis on January 1, 2009. The
adoption of the requirements of the Topic will materially affect the accounting
for any future business combinations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued an amendment to the requirements of the
Derivatives and Hedging Topic. The requirements of the amended Topic are
intended to improve financial reporting of derivative instruments and hedging
activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better
understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. The requirements of the amended Topic achieve these
improvements by requiring disclosure of the fair values of derivative
instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. It also provides
more information about an entity's liquidity by requiring disclosure of
derivative features that are credit risk-related. Finally, it requires
cross-referencing within footnotes to enable financial statement users to locate
important information about derivative instruments. The requirements of the
amended Topic became effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application
encouraged. The Company adopted the requirements of the amended Topic in the
first quarter of 2009. The adoption of the requirements of the amended Topic did
not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued an amendment to the requirements of
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other Topic. The requirements of the amended Topic are
intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of recognized
intangible assets and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair
value of the assets. The amendment changes the factors an entity should consider
in developing renewal or extension assumptions in determining the useful life of
recognized intangible assets. In addition the amended Topic requires disclosure
of the entity's accounting policy regarding costs incurred to renew or extend
the term of recognized intangible assets, the weighted average period to the
next renewal or extension, and the total amount of capitalized costs incurred to
renew or extend the term of recognized intangible assets. The requirements of
the amended Topic are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted the
requirements of the amended Topic on January 1, 2009. The adoption of the
requirements of the amended Topic did not have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued an amendment to the requirements of the Earnings
Per Share Topic, which addresses whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and,
therefore, need to be included in the computation of earnings per share under
the two-class method which apply to the Company because it grants instruments to
employees in share-based payment transactions that meet the definition of
participating securities, is effective retrospectively for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008.
The Company adopted the requirements of the amended Topic in the first quarter
of 2009. The adoption of the requirements of the amended Topic did not have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the requirements of the Financial
Instruments Topic. The amended Topic relates to fair value disclosures for any
financial instruments that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet at
fair value. Prior to issuing the requirements of the amended Topic, fair values
for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed once a year. The amended
Topic now requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative
and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial
instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value. The adoption of the
requirements of the amended Topic did not have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
The requirements of the Investments-Debt and Equity Securities Topic, is
intended to bring greater consistency to the timing of impairment recognition,
and provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit
components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The
Topic also requires increased and more timely disclosures regarding expected
cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized losses.
The adoption of the requirements of the Topic did not have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the requirements of the Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic. The Topic relates to determining fair
values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used
represent distressed sales. It states that the objective of fair value
measurement is to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly
transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the date of
the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, the
requirements of the Topic reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a
formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when
markets have become inactive. The adoption of the amended Topic did not have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the requirements of the Business
Combinations Topic. The requirements of the Business Topic clarifies to address
application issues on the accounting for contingencies in a business
combination. The requirements of the amended Topic is effective for assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations acquired on or
after January 1, 2009. The adoption of the requirements of the amended Topic did
not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the requirements of the Transfers
and Servicing Topic, which addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying
SPE concept and redefines who the primary beneficiary is for purposes of
determining which variable interest holder should consolidated the variable
interest entity. The requirements of the amended Topic become effective for
annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company is reviewing any
impact this may have on the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - a
Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 ("SFAS No. 168"). SFAS No. 168 established
that the FASB Accounting Standards Codification("the Codification") became the
single official source of authoritative U.S. GAAP, other than guidance issued by
the SEC. Following this statement, the FASB will not issue new standards in the
form of Statements, Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts.
Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates. All guidance
contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The GAAP
hierarchy was modified to include only two levels of GAAP: authoritative and
non-authoritative. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not
included in the Codification became non-authoritative. The Codification, which
changes the referencing of financial standards, became effective for interim and
annual periods ending on or after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS
No. 168 did have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The Company has adopted the requirements of the Subsequent Events Topic
effective beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and has evaluated
for disclosure subsequent events that have occurred up through November 13,
2009, the date of issuance of these financial statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The Company reported revenue of approximately $136.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, compared with revenue of $153.2 million for the
same period in 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of decreases in
Transaction Services and Investment Management revenue of $11.2 million and
$9.3 million, respectively, partially offset by increases in Management Services
revenue of $4.0 million.
The net loss attributable to Grubb & Ellis Company for the third quarter of 2009
was $21.4 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, and includes a non-cash charge of
$2.4 million for real estate related impairments and a $7.2 million charge,
which includes an allowance for bad debt and write-offs of related party
receivables and advances. In addition, the three month results included
approximately $2.6 million of stock-based compensation and $1.9 million for
amortization of other identified intangible assets.
The Company reported revenue of approximately $385.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, compared with revenue of $468.8 million for the same
period in 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of decreases in
Transaction Services and Investment Management revenue of $54.4 million and
$40.6 million, respectively, partially offset by increases in Management
Services revenue of $13.8 million.
The net loss attributable to Grubb & Ellis Company for the first nine months of
2009 was $95.7 million, or $1.51 per diluted share, and includes a non-cash
charge of $16.6 million for real estate related impairments and a $21.6 million
charge, which includes an allowance for bad debt and write-offs of related party
receivables and advances. In addition, the nine month results included
approximately $8.7 million of stock-based compensation and $5.7 million for
amortization of other identified intangible assets.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended
September 30, 2008
The following summarizes comparative results of operations for the periods
indicated.
Three Months Ended
September 30, Change
(In thousands) 2009 2008 $ %
Revenue
Management services $ 67,456 $ 63,479 $ 3,977 6.3 %
Transaction services 46,321 57,502 (11,181 ) (19.4 )
Investment management 14,829 24,116 (9,287 ) (38.5 )
Rental related 7,498 8,119 (621 ) (7.6 )
Total revenue 136,104 153,216 (17,112 ) (11.2 )
Operating Expense
Compensation costs 116,339 120,765 (4,426 ) (3.7 )
General and administrative 24,531 40,258 (15,727 ) (39.1 )
Depreciation and amortization 3,504 4,884 (1,380 ) (28.3 )
Rental related 4,961 4,337 624 14.4
Interest 3,741 2,947 794 26.9
Merger related costs 933 2,657 (1,724 ) (64.9 )
Real estate related impairments 2,393 34,778 (32,385 ) (93.1 )
Goodwill and intangible assets
impairment 583 - 583 100.0
Total operating expense 156,985 210,626 (53,641 ) (25.5 )
Operating Loss (20,881 ) (57,410 ) 36,529 63.6
Other (Expense) Income
Equity in losses of unconsolidated
entities (224 ) (5,859 ) 5,635 96.2
Interest income 188 234 (46 ) (19.7 )
Other income (loss) 272 (508 ) 780 153.5
Total other income (expense) 236 (6,133 ) 6,369 103.8
Loss from continuing operations
before income tax
(provision) benefit (20,645 ) (63,543 ) 42,898 67.5
Income tax (provision) benefit (277 ) 15,943 (16,220 ) (101.7 )
Loss from continuing operations (20,922 ) (47,600 ) 26,678 56.0
Discontinued Operations
Gain (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of taxes (535 ) (14,941 ) 14,406 96.4
(Loss) gain on disposal of
discontinued operations, net of
taxes - (185 ) 185 100.0
Total loss from discontinued
operations (535 ) (15,126 ) 14,591 96.5
Net loss (21,457 ) (62,726 ) 41,269 65.8
Net (loss) income from
noncontrolling interests (98 ) (6,444 ) 6,346 98.5
Net loss attributable to Grubb &
Ellis Company $ (21,359 ) $ (56,282 ) $ 34,923 62.1 %
|
Revenue
Transaction and Management Services Revenue
The Company earns revenue from the delivery of transaction and management
services to the commercial real estate industry. Transaction fees include
commissions from leasing, acquisition and disposition, and agency leasing
assignments as well as fees from appraisal and consulting services. Management
fees, which include reimbursed salaries, wages and benefits, comprise the
remainder of the Company's services revenue, and include fees related to both
property and facilities management outsourcing as well as project management and
business services. The Company has typically experienced its lowest quarterly
revenue from transaction services in the quarter ending March 31 of each year
with higher and more consistent revenue in the quarters ending June 30 and
September 30. The quarter ending December 31 has historically provided the
highest quarterly level of revenue due to increased activity caused by the
desire of clients to complete transactions by calendar year-end. As of
September 30, 2009, the Company managed approximately 242.9 million square feet
of property compared to 226.5 million square feet for the same period in 2008.
Management Services revenue increased $4.0 million or 6.3% to $67.5 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 which reflects an increase in square
feet under management of 15.3 million or 7.4% to 221.2 million total square feet
under management as of September 30, 2009. Management Services revenue, which is
primarily property management fees and reimbursable salaries, also includes
property management fee revenue of approximately $1.6 million and $1.9 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, from the
management of a significant portion of GERI's captive property portfolio by
Grubb & Ellis Managements Services.
Transaction Services revenue decreased $11.2 million or 19.4% to $46.3 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Transaction Services revenue
primarily includes brokerage commission, valuation and consulting revenue. The
Company's Transaction Services business was negatively impacted by the current
economic environment, which has reduced commercial real estate transaction
velocity, particularly investment sales.
Investment Management Revenue
Investment Management revenue decreased $9.3 million or 38.5% to $14.8 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Investment Management revenue
reflects revenue generated through the fee structure of the various investment
products which included acquisition, loan and disposition fees of approximately
$4.5 million and captive management fees of $7.9 million. Key drivers of this
business are the dollar value of equity raised, the amount of transactions that
are generated in the investment product platforms and the amount of assets under
management.
In total, $112.0 million in equity was raised for the Company's investment
programs for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared with
$245.0 million in the same period in 2008. The decrease was driven by a decrease
in TIC equity raised and by a decrease in equity raised by the Company's public
non-traded REITs. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the
Company's public non-traded REIT programs raised $111.5 million, a decrease of
39.2% from the $183.3 million equity raised in the same period in 2008. The
Company's TIC 1031 exchange programs raised $500,000 in equity during the third
quarter of 2009, compared with $46.2 million in the same period in 2008. The
decrease in TIC equity raised for the three months ended September 30, 2009
reflects the continued decline in current market conditions. The decrease in
equity raised by the Company's public non-traded REITs is a result of the
transition to the Company's Healthcare REIT II program which commenced
September 21, 2009.
Acquisition and loan fees decreased approximately $1.8 million, or 28.9%, to
approximately $4.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to approximately $6.3 million for the same period in 2008. The
quarter-over-quarter decrease in acquisition fees was primarily attributed a
decrease of $2.3 million in fees from the TIC programs partially offset by a
small increase in fees earned from the Company's non-traded REIT programs.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company acquired one
property on behalf of its sponsored programs for an approximate aggregate total
of $162.8 million, compared to six properties for an approximate aggregate total
of $240.3 million during the same period in 2008.
Disposition fees decreased approximately $502,000, or 100%, to zero for the
three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to approximately $502,000 for
the same period in 2008. Offsetting the disposition fees during the three months
ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $193,000 of amortization of
identified intangible contract rights associated with the acquisition of Triple
Net Properties Realty, Inc. ("Realty") as they represent the right to future
disposition fees of a portfolio of real properties under contract. No
amortization of identified intangible contract rights was recorded for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 because no disposition fees were recorded.
Captive management decreased approximately $2.0 million or 19.8% to $7.9 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 which primarily reflects an
increase in the deferral of fees.
Rental Revenue
Rental revenue includes pass-through revenue for the master lease accommodations
related to the Company's TIC programs. Rental revenue also includes revenue from
two properties held for investment.
Operating Expense Overview
The Company's operating expenses decreased approximately $53.6 million, or
25.5%, to $157.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared
to approximately $210.6 million for the same period in 2008. This decrease
reflects decreases in compensation costs from lower commissions paid and
synergies created as a result of the Merger of $4.4 million and decreases of
merger related costs of $1.7 million and general and administrative expense of
$15.7 million. The Company recognized real estate impairments of $2.4 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $32.4 million
over the same period last year. Partially offsetting the overall decrease was an
increase in interest expense of $794,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
Compensation Costs
Compensation costs decreased approximately $4.4 million, or 3.7%, to
$116.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to
approximately $120.8 million for the same period in 2008 due to a decrease in
commissions paid of approximately $7.6 million related to the Transactions
Services portfolio as a result of decrease in activity and a decrease of
approximately $1.3 million primarily related to the Investment Management
business as a result of a reduction in headcount and decreases in salaries
partially offset by an increase of $4.5 million as a result of an increase in
reimbursable salaries, wages and benefits due to the growth in the Management
Services portfolio.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense decreased approximately $15.7 million, or
39.1%, to $24.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared
to approximately $40.3 million for the same period in 2008 due to a decrease of
approximately $10.2 million in bad debt and related charges along with various
decreases related to management's cost saving efforts.
General and administrative expense was 18.0% of total revenue for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, compared with 26.3% for the same period in
2008.
Depreciation and Amortization
. . .
|
|